Gianardo v. Gianardo

55 Pa. D. & C.2d 658, 1971 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 221
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County·Decided December 21, 1971·No. no. 11601 of 1970·Published

Opinion

SAND, J.,

Rule 608 of the Rules of the Common Pleas Court of this county permits only plaintiff to request the prothonotary to assemble the record and send it to a judge for consideration, and further provides that the final decree must be prepared by plaintiff. This rule is in accord with cases which declare that the wrongdoer in a divorce action may not have a decree entered against himself or herself: Seltzer v. Seltzer, 29 Pa. Dist. Rep. 1040.

Since it is clear that defendant, by his attorney, requested the prothonotary to assemble the record and did prepare the final decree, and defendant’s action caused the decree to be entered against himself, the decree must be vacated or stricken off for a defect apparent on the face of the record. See Tanis v. Tanis, 206 Pa. Superior Ct. 213.

Accordingly, we enter the following

ORDER

And now, to wit, this December 21, 1971, it is ordered and decreed that the decree in divorce entered April 5, 1971, be and the same is hereby vacated and stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gianardo v. Gianardo, 55 Pa. D. & C.2d 658, 1971 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 221 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1971).

55 Pa. D. & C.2d 658 (Gianardo v. Gianardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tanis v. Tanis
213 A.2d 102 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)