Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Gian-Cursio v. State

Gian-Cursio v. State

196 So. 2d 105
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 1966
DocketNos. 35058, 35050
StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 2d 105 (Gian-Cursio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gian-Cursio v. State, 196 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 1966).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari and have heard oral argument. The decisions under review are Gian-Cursio v. State, and Epstein v. State, Fla.App., 180 So.2d 396. Our study of the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there is no jurisdictional conflict of decisions and that the writ was therefore improvidently issued and should be discharged. See, Hampton v. State, 50 Fla. 55, 39 So. 421, and, State v. Heines, 144 Fla. 272, 197 So. 787.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and O’CONNELL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and SEBRING (Ret.), JJ., concur. ROBERTS, J., dissents with opinion. DREW, J., dissents and agrees with ROBERTS, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gian-Cursio v. State
180 So. 2d 396 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Baldor v. Rogers
81 So. 2d 658 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
State v. Heines
197 So. 787 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Hampton v. State
50 Fla. 55 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 So. 2d 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gian-cursio-v-state-fla-1966.