Giampa v. Leahy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Giampa v. Leahy

149 A.D.2d 595, 540 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4919

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 149 A.D.2d 595 (Giampa v. Leahy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Giampa v. Leahy, 149 A.D.2d 595, 540 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondent Justice Leahy to issue an order with respect to his imposition of a $250 sanction against the petitioner.

Adjudged that the petition is granted, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that the respondent Justice Leahy is directed to sign an order with respect to the $250 sanction within five days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and judgment, with notice of entry.

[596]*596The petitioner is entitled to a written order with respect to the imposition of the subject sanction in order to enable him to ascertain the proper procedure for seeking review thereof. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondent Justice Leahy to issue an order with respect to his imposition of a $250 sanction against the petitioner.

Adjudged that the petition is granted, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that the respondent Justice Leahy is directed to sign an order with respect to the $250 sanction within five days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and judgment, with notice of entry.

[596]*596The petitioner is entitled to a written order with respect to the imposition of the subject sanction in order to enable him to ascertain the proper procedure for seeking review thereof. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 A.D.2d 595, 540 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giampa-v-leahy-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack