Giamanco v. Giamanco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Giamanco v. Giamanco

50 A.D.2d 586, 375 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12366

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 586 (Giamanco v. Giamanco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Giamanco v. Giamanco, 50 A.D.2d 586, 375 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12366 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— The respective attorneys for the parties on this appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 7, 1975, as granted a motion by plaintiff for temporary alimony, etc., have agreed, after a conference in this court before Mr. Justice Gittleson on October 23, 1975, that the order be reversed insofar as appealed from, without prejudice to renewal, at the trial, of plaintiff’s motion for alimony pendente lite and for a counsel fee, and that the case be tried on November 26, 1975, and thereupon signed a stipulation to such effect. In accordance with the foregoing, said order is reversed insofar as appealed from, without prejudice to renewal, at the trial, of plaintiff’s motion for alimony pendente lite and a counsel fee, and it is directed that the case proceed to trial on November 26, 1975. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— The respective attorneys for the parties on this appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 7, 1975, as granted a motion by plaintiff for temporary alimony, etc., have agreed, after a conference in this court before Mr. Justice Gittleson on October 23, 1975, that the order be reversed insofar as appealed from, without prejudice to renewal, at the trial, of plaintiff’s motion for alimony pendente lite and for a counsel fee, and that the case be tried on November 26, 1975, and thereupon signed a stipulation to such effect. In accordance with the foregoing, said order is reversed insofar as appealed from, without prejudice to renewal, at the trial, of plaintiff’s motion for alimony pendente lite and a counsel fee, and it is directed that the case proceed to trial on November 26, 1975. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 586, 375 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giamanco-v-giamanco-nyappdiv-1975.