Giallorenzi v. Caggiano

31 Misc. 785, 65 N.Y.S. 194

This text of 31 Misc. 785 (Giallorenzi v. Caggiano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Giallorenzi v. Caggiano, 31 Misc. 785, 65 N.Y.S. 194 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

Per Ouriarn.

The complaint does not show that the defendant at the time of the commencement of the action was a resident of the city of Kew York, as the same is now constituted, nor was any proof given upon the trial showing that such was the case.

Present: Beekmah, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobmah, JJ.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Misc. 785, 65 N.Y.S. 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giallorenzi-v-caggiano-nyappterm-1900.