Gialelis v. Rowe

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gialelis v. Rowe

132 S.E. 399, 35 Ga. App. 182, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 613

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 2, 1926

Docket17012

StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.E. 399 (Gialelis v. Rowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gialelis v. Rowe, 132 S.E. 399, 35 Ga. App. 182, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 613 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment in the municipal court of Atlanta in a suit on a contract alleged to have been entered into by him and defendant for services to be rendered by plaintiff as an attorney at law in representing defendant and three others charged with misdemeanors. The evidence having authorized the verdict, and there having been no reversible error in either the charge or rulings of the court, the petition for certiorari was properly denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment in the municipal court of Atlanta in a suit on a contract alleged to have been entered into by him and defendant for services to be rendered by plaintiff as an attorney at law in representing defendant and three others charged with misdemeanors. The evidence having authorized the verdict, and there having been no reversible error in either the charge or rulings of the court, the petition for certiorari was properly denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 S.E. 399, 35 Ga. App. 182, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gialelis-v-rowe-gactapp-1926.