Giacomozzi v. Town of Braintree
This text of 614 N.E.2d 678 (Giacomozzi v. Town of Braintree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of a single justice of this court denying a petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1990 ed.). That petition sought relief from the denial by a Superior Court judge of a request [1002]*1002for injunctive relief requiring the return of certain property seized from the plaintiff.2
“Our cases have emphasized that relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, may not be sought merely as a substitute for normal appellate review.” Soja v. T.P. Sampson Co., 373 Mass. 630, 631 (1977). The issues raised before the single justice could have been raised in an appeal to the Appeals Court from the denial of the plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief. See, e.g., G. L. c. 231, §§ 113 and 118, second par. (1990 ed.). There was no occasion for this court to exercise its extraordinary authority under G. L. c. 211, § 3.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
614 N.E.2d 678, 415 Mass. 1001, 1993 Mass. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giacomozzi-v-town-of-braintree-mass-1993.