Giacoman v. Boer

New York Court of Appeals

Giacoman v. Boer

202 N.E.2d 910, 15 N.Y.2d 554, 254 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 832

DecidedNovember 19, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 202 N.E.2d 910 (Giacoman v. Boer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Giacoman v. Boer, 202 N.E.2d 910, 15 N.Y.2d 554, 254 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 832 (N.Y. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Burke and Bergan. Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse the order and to dismiss the petition upon the ground that the evidence adduced does not rise to the minimal standard of entirely satisfactory evidence as required by the courts in this type of proceeding, for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Burke and Bergan. Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse the order and to dismiss the petition upon the ground that the evidence adduced does not rise to the minimal standard of entirely satisfactory evidence as required by the courts in this type of proceeding, for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 N.E.2d 910, 15 N.Y.2d 554, 254 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giacoman-v-boer-ny-1964.