Ghulam Mohammed Nasim v. Tandy Corporation

902 F.2d 1566, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6220, 1990 WL 64646
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 1990
Docket89-1812
StatusUnpublished

This text of 902 F.2d 1566 (Ghulam Mohammed Nasim v. Tandy Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ghulam Mohammed Nasim v. Tandy Corporation, 902 F.2d 1566, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6220, 1990 WL 64646 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

902 F.2d 1566
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ghulam Mohammed NASIM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TANDY CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-1812.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 22, 1990.
Decided April 20, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 85-1072-K))

Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, appellant pro se.

Barry Bach, Catherine Angela Potthast, Smith, Sommerville & Case, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md., 726 F.Supp. 1021.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Ghulam Mohammed Nasim appeals from the district court's order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment on his civil complaint.* Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nasim v. Tandy Corporation, C/A No. 85-1072-K (D.Md. July 20 and Sept. 15, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

We deny defendant's motion to dismiss the appeal

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nasim v. Tandy Corp.
726 F. Supp. 1021 (D. Maryland, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
902 F.2d 1566, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6220, 1990 WL 64646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ghulam-mohammed-nasim-v-tandy-corporation-ca4-1990.