Ghulam Mohammed Nasim v. State of Maryland Attorney General of the State of Maryland

59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23454, 1995 WL 376187
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 26, 1995
Docket95-6259
StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 167 (Ghulam Mohammed Nasim v. State of Maryland Attorney General of the State of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ghulam Mohammed Nasim v. State of Maryland Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23454, 1995 WL 376187 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ghulam Mohammed NASIM, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of Maryland; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-6259.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 26, 1995.

Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Nasim v. State of Maryland, No. CA-93-4142-B (D. Md. Feb. 2, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

In view of our disposition of this case, we deny Nasim's request to hold this case in abeyance pending a decision on rehearing in Nasim v. State of Maryland, 42 F.3d 1472 (4th Cir.1995)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nasim v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction
42 F.3d 1472 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23454, 1995 WL 376187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ghulam-mohammed-nasim-v-state-of-maryland-attorney-ca4-1995.