Ghingher v. Kausler

182 A. 566, 169 Md. 696
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 5, 1935·No. [No. 62, October Term, 1935.]·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion was delivered

per Curiam.

In this case, on facts similar to those stated in the opinion filed in the case of Ghingher, Receiver, v. Bachtell ante, p. 678, 182 A. 558, the same questions of law have been presented, and the conclusions are necessarily the same.

For the reasons stated in that opinion, therefore, the decree below will be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with that opinion.

Decree reversed, and came remanded, with costs to the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ghingher v. Kausler, 182 A. 566, 169 Md. 696 (Md. 1935).

182 A. 566 (Ghingher v. Kausler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hospelhorn v. Poe
198 A. 582 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1938)
Stockholders of Peoples Banking Co. v. Sterling
300 U.S. 175 (Supreme Court, 1937)