Ghignone v. Joy
This text of 432 N.E.2d 601 (Ghignone v. Joy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[855]*855OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. Mrs. Thompson is clearly entitled to “use or possession” of the apartment within the meaning of the decontrol provisions of the rent control statute, and has resided there continually since 1942. Accordingly, there has been no hiatus in possession or actual physical vacancy of the premises by the statutory tenant as would be required to support an order of decontrol.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Jones.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
432 N.E.2d 601, 55 N.Y.2d 853, 447 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ghignone-v-joy-ny-1982.