Ghidoni v. Hill Country S A Ltd

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 10, 1997
Docket97-50313
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ghidoni v. Hill Country S A Ltd (Ghidoni v. Hill Country S A Ltd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ghidoni v. Hill Country S A Ltd, (5th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

REVISED - October 10, 1997

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No.97-50313 Summary Calendar

IN THE MATTER OF: DONALD E. GHIDONI: Debtor, DONALD E. GHIDONI, Appellant,

versus HILL COUNTRY S.A., LTD.; JOHNNY W. THOMAS, TRUSTEE, Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (SA-96-CV-68)

October 3, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Donald E. Ghidoni, debtor in Chapter 11 and Chapter 7 proceedings, appeals

the district court’s affirmance of a judgment of the bankruptcy court in the Chapter

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 11 proceeding denying the debtor’s homestead exemptions and granting Hill

Country S.A., Ltd., declaratory relief, as well as the district court’s dismissal of an

appeal from the bankruptcy court in the Chapter 7 proceeding because the

appellant’s brief was not timely filed.

Our review of the record reflects neither clearly erroneous findings of fact

nor error of law and, on the facts as found and analysis made by the district court

in its Order dated April 21, 1997, the judgment appealed in the Chapter 11

proceeding is AFFIRMED.

Upon examination of the applicable Bankruptcy Rules, and for the reasons

well stated in the district court’s Order Dismissing Appeal signed on April 1, 1997

and Order Denying Motion for Rehearing signed on April 16, 1997, there was no

abuse of the district court’s discretion in dismissing the appeal in the Chapter 7

proceeding.1 The district court’s dismissal of the appeal in the Chapter 7

1 In the Matter of Braniff Airways, Inc., 774 F.2d 1303 (5th Cir. 1985). 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In The Matter Of Braniff Airways, Inc.
774 F.2d 1303 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ghidoni v. Hill Country S A Ltd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ghidoni-v-hill-country-s-a-ltd-ca5-1997.