Gherwal v. United States

46 F.2d 998, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2553
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 9, 1931
DocketNo. 6211
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 46 F.2d 998 (Gherwal v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gherwal v. United States, 46 F.2d 998, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2553 (9th Cir. 1931).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order made and entered on the 23d day of April, 1930, dismissing appellant’s bill in equity praying for a decree setting aside a certain other decree entered pro confesso on the 17th day'of November, 1924, revoking and canceling an order made on January 19,1922, granting to appellant a certificate of naturalization.

) The motion to dismiss was upon three grounds, and was granted upon the first, reading: “That the United States of Ameri;ca is made party defendant in said suit, and that there is no provision of law allowing or permitting the United States of America to be sued in this cause.”

The rule applied by the court below, to .the effect that the United States cannot be made a party to any suit, action, or proceeding without express authority'of Congress, (is well settled and is decisive of this ease. United States v. Clarke, 8 Pet. 437, 8 L. Ed. 1001; The Siren, 7 Wall. 152,19 L. Ed. 129; United States v. McLemore, 45 U. S. (4 How.) 286, 11 L. Ed. 977; Hill v. United States, 50 U. S. (9 How.) 385, 13 L. Ed. 185; Belknap v. Schild, 161 U. S. 10, 16 S. Ct. 443, 40 L. Ed. 599; Kirk v. United (States (C. C.) 131 F. 331; Buckley v. United (States (D. C.) 196 F. 429.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weldon v. United States
845 F. Supp. 72 (N.D. New York, 1994)
United States v. Kunz
5 F.R.D. 391 (S.D. New York, 1946)
United States v. Haas
58 F. Supp. 179 (N.D. New York, 1944)
Zegura v. United States
104 F.2d 34 (Fifth Circuit, 1939)
New England Furniture & Carpet Co. v. United States
2 F. Supp. 650 (D. Minnesota, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 F.2d 998, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gherwal-v-united-states-ca9-1931.