Gheorghian v. United States

19 F. App'x 852
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedAugust 30, 2001
DocketNo. 01-5126
StatusPublished

This text of 19 F. App'x 852 (Gheorghian v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gheorghian v. United States, 19 F. App'x 852 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

Opinion

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The United States moves to dismiss as untimely. Dumitru Gheorghian opposes.

On May 10, 2001, the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissed for lack of jurisdiction Gheorghian’s complaint protesting certain actions of his former wife, his attorneys, the local police department, and the California State courts. Judgment was entered on that same day. Gheorghian filed his notice of appeal on July 16, 2001, over 60 days after judgment.

Gheorghian concedes that his notice of appeal was untimely, but asks that we accept it nonetheless. Unfortunately, the court is unable to extend the statutory filing deadline. Because the notice of appeal was not filed within the 60-day statutory time period, we lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2107, 2522; Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 61, 108 S.Ct. 400, 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982) (the requirement of filing a timely notice of appeal is “mandatory and jurisdictional”); Sofarelli Associates, Inc. v. United States, 716 F.2d 1395, 1396-97 (Fed.Cir.1983).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The United States’ motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 F. App'x 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gheorghian-v-united-states-cafc-2001.