Ghee v. Goodwill Industries

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 1, 2009
Docket09-1409
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ghee v. Goodwill Industries (Ghee v. Goodwill Industries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ghee v. Goodwill Industries, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1409

ODESSA GHEE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GOODWILL INDUSTRIES,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:09-CV-00251-JFM)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 1, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Odessa Ghee, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Culp Hoelzer, Darrell Robert VanDeusen, KOLLMAN & SAUCIER, PA, Timonium, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Odessa Ghee appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to the Defendant in her civil action.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Ghee v. Goodwill Indus., No. 1:09-cv-00251-JFM (D.

Md. Mar. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ghee v. Goodwill Industries, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ghee-v-goodwill-industries-ca4-2009.