Ghee v. Goodwill Industries
This text of Ghee v. Goodwill Industries (Ghee v. Goodwill Industries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1409
ODESSA GHEE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:09-CV-00251-JFM)
Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 1, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Odessa Ghee, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Culp Hoelzer, Darrell Robert VanDeusen, KOLLMAN & SAUCIER, PA, Timonium, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Odessa Ghee appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Defendant in her civil action.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Ghee v. Goodwill Indus., No. 1:09-cv-00251-JFM (D.
Md. Mar. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ghee v. Goodwill Industries, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ghee-v-goodwill-industries-ca4-2009.