Ghazala v. State Farm Mutual Automobile

724 So. 2d 1273, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1397, 1999 WL 77727
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 12, 1999
DocketNo. 98-22
StatusPublished

This text of 724 So. 2d 1273 (Ghazala v. State Farm Mutual Automobile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ghazala v. State Farm Mutual Automobile, 724 So. 2d 1273, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1397, 1999 WL 77727 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

GRIFFIN, C.J.

In this appeal, Latifa Ghazala, the plaintiff below, asserts various errors and inadequacy in amounts awarded her by the jury. Appellant has declined to provide a transcript of the trial despite being given an opportunity to do so. Without the transcripts, we cannot determine that an error was committed, even as to the set-off issue.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
724 So. 2d 1273, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1397, 1999 WL 77727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ghazala-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-fladistctapp-1999.