Ghantous v. Stahl

733 So. 2d 1148, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7892, 1999 WL 391873
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 16, 1999·No. No. 98-2992·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our review of the appellant’s complaint filed in the action below, we affirm the dismissal of the libel count, but without prejudice for the appellant to amend to state a proper cause of action. See Hay v. Independent Newspapers, Inc., 450 So.2d 293, 294-95 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Ane, 423 So.2d 376, 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We however, affirm, with prejudice, the dismissal of the intentional infliction of emotional distress count as we deem the allegations, taken as true, to be insufficient, as a matter of law, to state a cause of action. See Clemente v. Home, 707 So.2d 865, 866 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ghantous v. Stahl, 733 So. 2d 1148, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7892, 1999 WL 391873 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

733 So. 2d 1148 (Ghantous v. Stahl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Ane
423 So. 2d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Clemente v. Horne
707 So. 2d 865 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Hay v. Independent Newspapers, Inc.
450 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)