Ghalayini v. Bennet
This text of Ghalayini v. Bennet (Ghalayini v. Bennet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Joshua Ghalayini, 2:24-cv-01926-JAD-MDC 4 Plaintiff, ORDER 5 vs. 6 Patrick Bennet, 7 Defendant. 8 Plaintiff Joshua Ghalayini has failed to notify the Court of his change of address. See ECF Nos. 9 6,7) (Mail returned as undeliverable: unable to forward). A search of the inmate database does not 10 appear to return any results. Therefore, it is unclear whether plaintiff is still located at Stein Hospital, 11 still incarcerated, or has since been released. The Court reminds plaintiff that it is his responsibility to 12 immediately notify the Court of any change of mailing address. The Court’s Local Rules state:
13 An attorney or pro se party must immediately file with the court written notification of any change of mailing address, email address, telephone number, or facsimile number. 14 The notification must include proof of service on each opposing party or the party’s attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in the dismissal of the action, entry 15 of default judgment, or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court. 16 LR IA 3-1 17 Because it appears that plaintiff did not receive the Court’s Order (see ECF No. 7) denying his 18 IFP application the Court will give plaintiff another opportunity to either pay the filing fee or file the 19 correct IFP application in compliance with the Order (see ECF No. 4). 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 1 ACCORDINGLY, 2 IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff must: [1] file a Notice of Change of Address and [2] file the 3 || correct IFP application or pay the filing fee, by no later than August 8, 2025. Failure to timely comply 4 || with this Order may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. 5 6 DATED this 9" day of July 2025. oa _ 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. tpg, YO pf fA , 8 Hee Maximiligpo D\ Couvivier I] 9 pres Stateypoeisy udge
11 NOTICE 12 Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and
4 recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk
of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal
6 may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified
time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985).
This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections within the specified time and (2)
9 failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District 50 Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d
1 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
0 Pursuant to LR IA 3-1, the plaintiff must immediately file written notification with the court of any
33 change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party’s attorney,
or upon the opposing party if the party is unrepresented by counsel. Failure to comply with this rule may
95 result in dismissal of the action.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ghalayini v. Bennet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ghalayini-v-bennet-nvd-2025.