Ghaffari v. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
712 N.W.2d 453, 474 Mich. 1119
This text of 712 N.W.2d 453 (Ghaffari v. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ghaffari v. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 712 N.W.2d 453, 474 Mich. 1119 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Louis GHAFFARI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Hoyt, Brum & Link, and Guideline Mechanical, Inc., Defendants, Cross-Defendants-Appellees, and
R.W. Mead & Sons, Inc., and Conti Electric, Inc., Third-Party Defendants, and
Acoustical Ceiling & Partition Company, Defendant, and
The Edison Institute, a/k/a Henry Ford Museum & Greenfield Village, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Thomas
712 N.W.2d 453 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
712 N.W.2d 453, 474 Mich. 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ghaffari-v-turner-construction-company-mich-2006.