Ghaffari v. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
712 N.W.2d 453, 474 Mich. 1119
Opinion
Louis GHAFFARI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Hoyt, Brum & Link, and Guideline Mechanical, Inc., Defendants, Cross-Defendants-Appellees, and
R.W. Mead & Sons, Inc., and Conti Electric, Inc., Third-Party Defendants, and
Acoustical Ceiling & Partition Company, Defendant, and
The Edison Institute, a/k/a Henry Ford Museum & Greenfield Village, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ghaffari v. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 712 N.W.2d 453, 474 Mich. 1119 (Mich. 2006).
712 N.W.2d 453 (Ghaffari v. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Thomas
712 N.W.2d 453 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)