Geyerhahn v. Geyerhahn

97 A.2d 230, 148 Me. 534, 1953 Me. LEXIS 21
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedMay 26, 1953
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 A.2d 230 (Geyerhahn v. Geyerhahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Geyerhahn v. Geyerhahn, 97 A.2d 230, 148 Me. 534, 1953 Me. LEXIS 21 (Me. 1953).

Opinion

Thaxter, J.

This is a libel for divorce brought by a husband against his wife for cruel and abusive treatment. Two children have been born to the marriage, George age 8, and Gordon age 6. Service was made on the libellee and on her legally appointed guardian. She is now and apparently has been for a number of years hopelessly insane. The judge who heard the case denied the divorce; and exceptions were taken to this court.

Undoubtedly the libellant has had a very unhappy time. Dr. Francis H. Sleeper, the superintendent of the hospital, was a witness. He testified that this woman was under his care at the hospital for some three years; that a lobotomy, a very radical brain operation, was performed in an effort to help her; but her condition must be regarded as hopeless. The trial judge made no findings of fact.

[535]*535Insanity is not a ground for divorce in Maine and this court has no power to make it one. We do not make the laws. The trial court may have found that this unfortunate woman may not have known the difference between right and wrong; or he may have been of the opinion that the evidence of cruel and abusive treatment was insufficient to grant the divorce.

We said in Hadley v. Hadley, 144 Me. 127, 130: “It is well established in this State that the general principle applicable to factual findings, i.e., that those made by the trier of fact will not be disturbed in appellate proceedings if supported by credible evidence, is controlling in divorce proceedings.”

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kennon v. Kennon
111 A.2d 695 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A.2d 230, 148 Me. 534, 1953 Me. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geyerhahn-v-geyerhahn-me-1953.