Geyelin v. Pinellas County

497 So. 2d 999, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2481, 13 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2072, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10868
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 26, 1986·No. No. 86-2737·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for certiorari is granted and the subpoena is quashed. We find from our consideration of this matter in its en[1000]*1000tirety, including a review of the transcript of the hearing held on the petitioner’s motion to quash the subpoena, that the respondent failed to satisfy two of the criteria essential to the enforcement of the subpoena, i.e., that the information sought pursuant to the subpoena was not available from alternative sources and that there was a compelling need for any information within the petitioner’s knowledge. The Tribune Company v. Green, 440 So.2d 484 (Fla.2d DCA 1983).

DANAHY, C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Geyelin v. Pinellas County, 497 So. 2d 999, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2481, 13 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2072, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10868 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

497 So. 2d 999 (Geyelin v. Pinellas County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Abreu
38 Fla. Supp. 2d 67 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1989)