Geyelin v. Pinellas County
This text of 497 So. 2d 999 (Geyelin v. Pinellas County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for certiorari is granted and the subpoena is quashed. We find from our consideration of this matter in its en[1000]*1000tirety, including a review of the transcript of the hearing held on the petitioner’s motion to quash the subpoena, that the respondent failed to satisfy two of the criteria essential to the enforcement of the subpoena, i.e., that the information sought pursuant to the subpoena was not available from alternative sources and that there was a compelling need for any information within the petitioner’s knowledge. The Tribune Company v. Green, 440 So.2d 484 (Fla.2d DCA 1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
497 So. 2d 999, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2481, 13 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2072, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geyelin-v-pinellas-county-fladistctapp-1986.