Gewinner v. McCrary

Supreme Court of Georgia

Gewinner v. McCrary

25 S.E. 648, 99 Ga. 299

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedAugust 10, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 25 S.E. 648 (Gewinner v. McCrary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gewinner v. McCrary, 25 S.E. 648, 99 Ga. 299 (Ga. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

In view of the conflicting evidence disclosed by the record, there was no abuse of discretion in granting the interlocutory injunction. Had it been otherwise, seemingly there would now be no occasion for reversing the judgment, since the death of the party enjoined, occurring after the writ of error was sued out, has taken the question of injunction out of the case. The remaining questions at issue can be adjudicated at the final trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons, C. J.

In view of the conflicting evidence disclosed by the record, there was no abuse of discretion in granting the interlocutory injunction. Had it been otherwise, seemingly there would now be no occasion for reversing the judgment, since the death of the party enjoined, occurring after the writ of error was sued out, has taken the question of injunction out of the case. The remaining questions at issue can be adjudicated at the final trial. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 S.E. 648, 99 Ga. 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gewinner-v-mccrary-ga-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack