Gevyn Construction Corp.

Court of Claims

Gevyn Construction Corp.

180 Ct. Cl. 1306, 1967 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 125, 1967 WL 1562

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedJuly 3, 1967

DocketNo. 327-65

StatusPublished

This text of 180 Ct. Cl. 1306 (Gevyn Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gevyn Construction Corp., 180 Ct. Cl. 1306, 1967 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 125, 1967 WL 1562 (cc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Contracts; release. — Plaintiff sues to recover $42,530.70 as compensation for the performance of alleged extra work in connection with its contract for modernizing and air conditioning the United States Post Office in New Rochelle, New York. Defendant has moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff’s claim is barred by reason of a release executed subsequent to the occurrence of the events giving rise to plaintiff’s claim. The case came before the court upon defendant’s motion and plaintiff’s opposition thereto and without oral argument. The court concluded that the claim is barred by the general release and that, even accepting plaintiff’s allegations regarding its inadvertent failure to except certain claims, there is no reason to believe defendant should have been aware of this fact (see J. G. Watts Constr. Co. v. United States 161 Ct. Cl. 801 (1963)), and on July 3, 1967, the court ordered that the petition be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Contracts; release. — Plaintiff sues to recover $42,530.70 as compensation for the performance of alleged extra work in connection with its contract for modernizing and air conditioning the United States Post Office in New Rochelle, New York. Defendant has moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff’s claim is barred by reason of a release executed subsequent to the occurrence of the events giving rise to plaintiff’s claim. The case came before the court upon defendant’s motion and plaintiff’s opposition thereto and without oral argument. The court concluded that the claim is barred by the general release and that, even accepting plaintiff’s allegations regarding its inadvertent failure to except certain claims, there is no reason to believe defendant should have been aware of this fact (see J. G. Watts Constr. Co. v. United States 161 Ct. Cl. 801 (1963)), and on July 3, 1967, the court ordered that the petition be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 Ct. Cl. 1306, 1967 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 125, 1967 WL 1562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gevyn-construction-corp-cc-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack