Gevara v. Keller

408 F. App'x 761
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 21, 2011·No. No. 10-7544·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jorge Gevara seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying reconsideration of its previous order denying Gevara’s motion to amend his complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., [762]*762337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Gevara seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gevara v. Keller, 408 F. App'x 761 (4th Cir. 2011).

408 F. App'x 761 (Gevara v. Keller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gevara v. Keller
180 L. Ed. 2d 854 (Supreme Court, 2011)