Getz v. Searles

265 A.D.2d 839, 695 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9901
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 1, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 265 A.D.2d 839 (Getz v. Searles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Getz v. Searles, 265 A.D.2d 839, 695 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed [840]*840with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries sustained by his son, Eric Getz, when the Ford Mustang in which Eric was a passenger collided with a truck. Defendant Gabriele Auto Place, Inc. (Gabriele) had sold the Mustang on July 20, 1994 to Jacqueline Bourne, who took possession of the vehicle that day. Bourne was operating the Mustang with dealer’s plates when the accident occurred on August 25, 1994.

Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendants Milton Searles and Rist Transport, Ltd. and the cross motion of plaintiff and granted judgment declaring that Gabriele is the owner of the Mustang and is vicariously liable for Bourne’s alleged negligence in operating the Mustang. The court also properly denied the cross motion of Gabriele for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. The record establishes that Gabriele violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 416 by permitting Bourne to use its dealer’s plates for over a month and failing to notify the Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles of Bourne’s failure to return the plates before the expiration of six days after Bourne took possession of the vehicle (see, Jamison v Walker, 48 AD2d 320, 324). Under those circumstances, Gabriele is estopped from denying ownership of the Mustang (see, Switzer v Aldrich, 307 NY 56, 58-59; Reese v Reamore, 292 NY 292, 296-297; Jamison v Walker, supra, at 324; see also, Brown v Harper, 231 AD2d 483, 484; Taylor v Botnick Motor Corp., 146 AD2d 81, 84-85). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Scudder, J.— Declaratory Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garcia v. Davis
53 A.D.3d 525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Genesee Regional Bank v. Palumbo
9 Misc. 3d 823 (New York Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D.2d 839, 695 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/getz-v-searles-nyappdiv-1999.