Getz Bros. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 1012, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2814
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Getz Bros. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 55 Cust. Ct. 693 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 6, 1968·No. No. P68/119; protests 62/3499, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of sink strainers in chief value of iron similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies, Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651) and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of sink strainers in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 69651, supra, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Getz Bros. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1012, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2814 (cusc 1968).
60 Cust. Ct. 1012 (Getz Bros. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davies, Turner & Co. v. United States
55 Cust. Ct. 488 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)