Getz Bros. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1012, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2814
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 6, 1968
DocketNo. P68/119; protests 62/3499, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 1012 (Getz Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Getz Bros. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1012, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2814 (cusc 1968).

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of sink strainers in chief value of iron similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies, Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651) and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of sink strainers in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 69651, supra, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davies, Turner & Co. v. United States
55 Cust. Ct. 488 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Cust. Ct. 1012, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/getz-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1968.