Getz Bros. v. United States
This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 1012 (Getz Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of sink strainers in chief value of iron similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies, Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651) and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of sink strainers in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 69651, supra, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 Cust. Ct. 1012, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/getz-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1968.