Getz Bros. & Co. v. Alaska Packers' Ass'n

258 F. 526, 49 App. D.C. 54, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1244
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 5, 1919
DocketNo. 1208
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 258 F. 526 (Getz Bros. & Co. v. Alaska Packers' Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Getz Bros. & Co. v. Alaska Packers' Ass'n, 258 F. 526, 49 App. D.C. 54, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1244 (D.C. Cir. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant sought the registration of the word “Premium” as a trade-mark for canned salmon. This was opposed by the appellee, who asserted that it was the prior user of the word “Premier” as a mark on the same kind of goods; that its mark was registered in the Patent Office in 1894; that the two words had much the same sound and appearance, and a similar meaning; and that the use of them by both parties upon the goods in question would be likely to produce confusion in trade. The opposition was sustained by the Examiner of Interferences, and his action affirmed on appeal by the Commissioner.

[1,2] We think the Patent Office was right, and we affirm the Commissioner’s decision, for the reasons given in his opinion, as well as upon the authority of Thomas Manufacturing Co. v. Æolian Co., 47 App. D. C. 376, 378, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Christo Mfg. Co. v. Christian Moerlein Brewing Co.
265 F. 1010 (District of Columbia, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
258 F. 526, 49 App. D.C. 54, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/getz-bros-co-v-alaska-packers-assn-cadc-1919.