Gettys v. Browning
This text of 417 So. 2d 1094 (Gettys v. Browning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial judge’s order refusing to vacate and set aside a final judgment entered after default. The proof presented below to overcome the presumptive correctness of the return, Vellanti v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 394 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), which reflected that Gettys was personally served was neither undisputed nor so clear and convincing as to require that the default be set aside. The record evidence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom support the trial judge’s conclusion, and we cannot substitute our judgment for his. Compare Winky’s, Inc. v. Francis, 229 So.2d 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970), with McIntosh v. Wibbeler, 106 So.2d 195 (Fla.1958).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
417 So. 2d 1094, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gettys-v-browning-fladistctapp-1982.