Gettys v. . Blanton
187 S.E. 761, 210 N.C. 836, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 255
Opinion
The record in this case is not altogether clear, albeit the single exception “to the signing of the judgment,” appearing on the record, limits the appeal to the sufficiency of the concessions and findings to support the judgment. Blades v. Trust Co., 207 N. C., 771, 178 S. E., 565; Wilson v. Charlotte, 206 N. C., 856, 175 S. E., 306; Mfg. Co. v. Lbr. Co., 178 N. C., 571, 101 S. E., 214.
In this view of the matter, we cannot say that error has been shown. Hence, the judgment will be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gettys v. . Blanton, 187 S.E. 761, 210 N.C. 836, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 255 (N.C. 1936).
187 S.E. 761 (Gettys v. . Blanton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blades v. Wilmington Trust Co.
178 S.E. 565 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
Wilson v. City of Charlotte
175 S.E. 306 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)