Gettys v. . Blanton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Gettys v. . Blanton

187 S.E. 761, 210 N.C. 836, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 255

DecidedOctober 14, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 187 S.E. 761 (Gettys v. . Blanton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gettys v. . Blanton, 187 S.E. 761, 210 N.C. 836, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 255 (N.C. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record in this case is not altogether clear, albeit the single exception “to the signing of the judgment,” appearing on the record, limits the appeal to the sufficiency of the concessions and findings to support the judgment. Blades v. Trust Co., 207 N. C., 771, 178 S. E., 565; Wilson v. Charlotte, 206 N. C., 856, 175 S. E., 306; Mfg. Co. v. Lbr. Co., 178 N. C., 571, 101 S. E., 214.

In this view of the matter, we cannot say that error has been shown. Hence, the judgment will be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record in this case is not altogether clear, albeit the single exception “to the signing of the judgment,” appearing on the record, limits the appeal to the sufficiency of the concessions and findings to support the judgment. Blades v. Trust Co., 207 N. C., 771, 178 S. E., 565; Wilson v. Charlotte, 206 N. C., 856, 175 S. E., 306; Mfg. Co. v. Lbr. Co., 178 N. C., 571, 101 S. E., 214.

In this view of the matter, we cannot say that error has been shown. Hence, the judgment will be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 S.E. 761, 210 N.C. 836, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gettys-v-blanton-nc-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack