Getty Oil Company v. Loden

326 A.2d 868, 1974 Del. LEXIS 307
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided September 24, 1974·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court denying summary judgment to the defendants. The Superior Court opinion is reported. Loden v. Getty Oil Company, Del.Super., 316 A.2d 214 (1974).

In our judgment, the Superior Court was correct in finding that the deceased was not an employee of Getty Oil Company and that this action is not barred by the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Compare Balma v. Tidewater Oil Company, Del.Supr., 214 A.2d 560 (1965). In adopting this finding, we express no opinion on whether there may be independent grounds to support the conclusion below on the basis of the particular contract between Getty Oil Company and Catalytic Construction Company and/or the statutory provision, 19 Del.C., § 2311.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Getty Oil Company v. Loden, 326 A.2d 868, 1974 Del. LEXIS 307 (Del. 1974).

326 A.2d 868 (Getty Oil Company v. Loden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wood v. Collison
Superior Court of Delaware, 2014
Hicks v. Alabama Power Co.
623 So. 2d 1050 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1993)
Dickinson v. Eastern Railroad Builders, Inc.
403 A.2d 717 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1979)