Gettel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gettel v. State

442 So. 2d 1011, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24208

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 23, 1983

DocketNo. 82-2712

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 442 So. 2d 1011 (Gettel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gettel v. State, 442 So. 2d 1011, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24208 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

LEHAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for multiple counts of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. We affirm.

Defendant objects to being limited on the scope of recross examination of one witness and redirect examination of another witness. However, we do not find the limitation to have been prejudicial. The questions that defendant was prevented from asking would not have adduced competent, relevant evidence.

AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI