Gettel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gettel v. State

442 So. 2d 1011, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24208

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 23, 1983·No. No. 82-2712·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LEHAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for multiple counts of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. We affirm.

Defendant objects to being limited on the scope of recross examination of one witness and redirect examination of another witness. However, we do not find the limitation to have been prejudicial. The questions that defendant was prevented from asking would not have adduced competent, relevant evidence.

AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LEHAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for multiple counts of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. We affirm.

Defendant objects to being limited on the scope of recross examination of one witness and redirect examination of another witness. However, we do not find the limitation to have been prejudicial. The questions that defendant was prevented from asking would not have adduced competent, relevant evidence.

AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

Gettel v. State, 442 So. 2d 1011, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24208 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

442 So. 2d 1011 (Gettel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related