Getray Investments, N.V. v. Grove Towers, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Getray Investments, N.V. v. Grove Towers, Inc.

467 So. 2d 733, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 863, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13104

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 1985

DocketNo. 84-860

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 467 So. 2d 733 (Getray Investments, N.V. v. Grove Towers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Getray Investments, N.V. v. Grove Towers, Inc., 467 So. 2d 733, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 863, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13104 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The primary issue for determination is whether appellee/developer Grove Towers, Inc. violated the registration and disclosure requirements of the Interstate Land Sales Act [ILSA], 15 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1720 (1982) (effective June 1, 1979), by failing to furnish a property report to appellant/purchaser Getray Investments, N.V. prior to the signing of the purchase and sale contract. The issue presented here has been thoroughly addressed by this court in a recently published opinion, Grove Towers, Inc. v. Lopez, 467 So.2d 358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), which answered the question adversely to appellee’s contention. We reverse upon the authority of Grove Towers, Inc. v. Lopez and remand for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The primary issue for determination is whether appellee/developer Grove Towers, Inc. violated the registration and disclosure requirements of the Interstate Land Sales Act [ILSA], 15 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1720 (1982) (effective June 1, 1979), by failing to furnish a property report to appellant/purchaser Getray Investments, N.V. prior to the signing of the purchase and sale contract. The issue presented here has been thoroughly addressed by this court in a recently published opinion, Grove Towers, Inc. v. Lopez, 467 So.2d 358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), which answered the question adversely to appellee’s contention. We reverse upon the authority of Grove Towers, Inc. v. Lopez and remand for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

467 So. 2d 733, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 863, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/getray-investments-nv-v-grove-towers-inc-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack