Geter, Guardian v. Boyd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Geter, Guardian v. Boyd

1912 OK 627, 127 P. 388, 34 Okla. 743, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 474

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 15, 1912·No. 2085·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

AMES, C.

It is stipulated between the plaintiff in error and defendant in error in this case that, this is substantially the same as the case of Daniel Geter, Guardian of Dollie Corbray, v. Charles E. Ulrich, ante, 127 Pac. 387, which has just been decided; and for the reasons stated in.that opinion the judgment of the district court should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

AMES, C.

It is stipulated between the plaintiff in error and defendant in error in this case that, this is substantially the same as the case of Daniel Geter, Guardian of Dollie Corbray, v. Charles E. Ulrich, ante, 127 Pac. 387, which has just been decided; and for the reasons stated in.that opinion the judgment of the district court should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Geter, Guardian v. Boyd, 1912 OK 627, 127 P. 388, 34 Okla. 743, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 474 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK 627 (Geter, Guardian v. Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related