Getchell v. Chase
124 Mass. 366, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 324
Opinion
Upon the facts stated in the trustee’s answer, the check was evidently given by him and received by the principal defendant as payment, and operated as such, at least until presentment and refusal, which in this case did not happen. Nothing therefore was due from the trustee to the defendant at the time of the service of this process. Pearce v. Davis, 1 Mood. & Rob. 365. Barnard v. Graves, 16 Pick. 41. Cushman v Libbey, 15 Gray, 358. Trustee discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Getchell v. Chase, 124 Mass. 366, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 324 (Mass. 1878).
124 Mass. 366 (Getchell v. Chase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hart v. O. L. Williams Veneer Co.
4 N.E.2d 499 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1936)
Universal Supply Co. v. Hildreth
192 N.E. 23 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Kerr Furniture Co. v. American Railway Express Co.
1930 OK 477 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930)
American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Scrimger
100 A. 774 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1917)
American Exchange National Bank v. Superior Court
154 P. 279 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)
Matlock v. Scheuerman
93 P. 823 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1908)
Parker-Fain Grocery Co. v. Orr
57 S.E. 1074 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Larsen v. Allan Line Steamship Co.
88 P. 753 (Washington Supreme Court, 1907)
Prewitt v. Brown
73 S.W. 897 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)
National Park Bank v. Levy Bros. & Co.
19 L.R.A. 475 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1892)