Gessner T. McCorvey v. Autherine J. Lucy

328 F.2d 892, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6052
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 13, 1964
Docket20898_1
StatusPublished

This text of 328 F.2d 892 (Gessner T. McCorvey v. Autherine J. Lucy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gessner T. McCorvey v. Autherine J. Lucy, 328 F.2d 892, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6052 (5th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

328 F.2d 892

Gessner T. McCORVEY et al., Appellants,
v.
Autherine J. LUCY et al., Appellees.

No. 20898.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

March 13, 1964.

Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; Harlan Hobart Grooms, Judge.

Andrew J. Thomas, Frontis H. Moore, Samuel H. Burr, Birmingham, Ala., Moore, Thomas, Taliaferro, Forman & Burr, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for appellants.

Fred D. Gray, Montgomery, Ala., Constance Baker Motley, New York City, Arthur D. Shores, Birmingham, Ala., Jack Greenberg, Leroy D. Clark, George B. Smith, Frank H. Heffron, New York City, for appellees Vivian J. Malone, et al.

Charles Morgan, Jr., Alexandria, Va., for appellees Marvin P. Carroll and Dave M. McGlathery.

Before MAGRUDER,* JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court, D.C., 224 F.Supp. 79, is

Affirmed.

Notes:

*

Senior Circuit Judge of the First Circuit, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lucy v. Adams
224 F. Supp. 79 (N.D. Alabama, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
328 F.2d 892, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gessner-t-mccorvey-v-autherine-j-lucy-ca5-1964.