Home/New York Court of Appeals/Gerzof v. Town of Huntington

Gerzof v. Town of Huntington

168 N.E.2d 131, 8 N.Y.2d 788
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 29, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 168 N.E.2d 131 (Gerzof v. Town of Huntington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gerzof v. Town of Huntington, 168 N.E.2d 131, 8 N.Y.2d 788 (N.Y. 1960).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Foster. Judges Froessel and Van Voorhis dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the judgment of the Official [790]*790Referee on the ground that upon this record the zoning ordinance precludes the use of plaintiff’s property for any purpose for which it is reasonably adapted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of Bedford
92 A.D.2d 267 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 N.E.2d 131, 8 N.Y.2d 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerzof-v-town-of-huntington-ny-1960.