Gerzof v. Shaffer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gerzof v. Shaffer

129 A.D.2d 638, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45318

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 129 A.D.2d 638 (Gerzof v. Shaffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gerzof v. Shaffer, 129 A.D.2d 638, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45318 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Secretary of State, dated December 17, 1985, which, inter alia, suspended the petitioner’s real estate license for six months, effective February 1, 1986.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The imposition of a six-month suspension of the petitioner’s real estate license on the grounds of untrustworthiness and incompetence under Real Property Law § 441-c is fully supported by substantial evidence in the record, and we therefore cannot disturb it. We have considered the petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Secretary of State, dated December 17, 1985, which, inter alia, suspended the petitioner’s real estate license for six months, effective February 1, 1986.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The imposition of a six-month suspension of the petitioner’s real estate license on the grounds of untrustworthiness and incompetence under Real Property Law § 441-c is fully supported by substantial evidence in the record, and we therefore cannot disturb it. We have considered the petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A.D.2d 638, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerzof-v-shaffer-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack