Gerwitz v. Brogan

219 A.D.2d 863, 632 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10999

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in ordering plaintiff to reimburse defendant for improvements made by defendant to plaintiff’s property, in the absence of a request by defendant for such reimbursement or any other equitable relief (cf., Kraker v Roll, 100 AD2d 424, 433; Roller v Frankel, 9 AD2d 24, appeal dismissed 9 NY2d 649). We, therefore, modify the judgment on appeal by vacating that portion awarding defendant $49,600 for the improvements. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Allegany County, Kelly, J.H.O. — Ejectment.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gerwitz v. Brogan, 219 A.D.2d 863, 632 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

219 A.D.2d 863 (Gerwitz v. Brogan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roller v. Frankel
9 A.D.2d 24 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Kraker v. Roll
100 A.D.2d 424 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)