Gervin v. Meredith

2 N.C. 635
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gervin v. Meredith. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 N.C. 439
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 15, 1816·Published

Opinion

Cameron, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The rule which allows hearsay evidence to prove the boundaries of lands, restricts it to the declarations of deceased persons. We do not conceive that the circumstance [636]*636of the witness living out of the State, authorises any relaxation of the rule. The testimony of the witness, though living in Tennessee, might have been procured by deposition. The declarations of the witness, not on oath, was not the best evidence, which it was in the power of the party offering it to adduce.

We are, therefore, of opinion, that the rule for a new trial should be made absolute. A new trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gervin v. Meredith, 2 N.C. 635 (N.C. 1816).

2 N.C. 635 (Gervin v. Meredith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.