Gervich v. Cedar Rapids Hide & Fur Co.
This text of 286 N.W. 411 (Gervich v. Cedar Rapids Hide & Fur Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant, before answer, moved for change of place of trial from Marshall county to Linn county under section 11053, Code of Iowa 1935. This motion, having been overruled, was renewed at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and was *1224 sustained. Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal solely from the ruling ordering the cause transferred.
Appellee has moved for a dismissal of the appeal upon the ground, among other things, that appeal does not lie from such order. The motion must be sustained and the appeal dismissed. Allerton v. Eldridge, 56 Iowa 709, 10 N. W. 252; Groves v. Richmond, 58 Iowa 54, 12 N. W. 80; Edgerly v. Stewart & Hunter, 86 Iowa 87, 52 N. W. 1121; Smith v. Morrison, 203 Iowa 245, 212 N. W. 567.
Although unnecessary to this decision, we again call attention to the requirements of Rule 30 in the preparation of briefs. —Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 N.W. 411, 226 Iowa 1223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gervich-v-cedar-rapids-hide-fur-co-iowa-1939.