Gervich v. Cedar Rapids Hide & Fur Co.

286 N.W. 411, 226 Iowa 1223
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 20, 1939·No. No. 44801.·Published

Opinion

Oliver, J.

Defendant, before answer, moved for change of place of trial from Marshall county to Linn county under section 11053, Code of Iowa 1935. This motion, having been overruled, was renewed at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and was *1224 sustained. Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal solely from the ruling ordering the cause transferred.

Appellee has moved for a dismissal of the appeal upon the ground, among other things, that appeal does not lie from such order. The motion must be sustained and the appeal dismissed. Allerton v. Eldridge, 56 Iowa 709, 10 N. W. 252; Groves v. Richmond, 58 Iowa 54, 12 N. W. 80; Edgerly v. Stewart & Hunter, 86 Iowa 87, 52 N. W. 1121; Smith v. Morrison, 203 Iowa 245, 212 N. W. 567.

Although unnecessary to this decision, we again call attention to the requirements of Rule 30 in the preparation of briefs. —Appeal dismissed.

Mitchell, C. J., and Sager, Miller, Hamilton, Richards, Bliss, and Hale, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gervich v. Cedar Rapids Hide & Fur Co., 286 N.W. 411, 226 Iowa 1223 (iowa 1939).

286 N.W. 411 (Gervich v. Cedar Rapids Hide & Fur Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Morrison
212 N.W. 567 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1927)
Allerton v. Eldridge
10 N.W. 252 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1881)
Groves v. Richmond
58 Iowa 54 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1882)
J. W. Edgerly & Co. v. Stewart & Hunter
86 Iowa 87 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1892)