Gertrude Nyanjega v. David Douglas
This text of Gertrude Nyanjega v. David Douglas (Gertrude Nyanjega v. David Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 19-1868 ___________________________
Gertrude Nyanjega; Duba Roba
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants
v.
David Douglas, District Director, USCIS, St. Paul Field Office; Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States; Elaine Duke, Ag-Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; Leslie Tritten, Field Office Director
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________
Submitted: February 4, 2020 Filed: February 13, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. In this action seeking relief under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), Gertrude Nyanjega and Duba Roba appeal after the district court1 declined to take judicial notice of certain documents and granted summary judgment in favor of defendants. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Cravens v. Smith, 610 F.3d 1019, 1029 (8th Cir. 2010) (district court does not abuse its discretion by declining to take judicial notice of irrelevant materials; moreover, any error in failing to take judicial notice is not grounds for reversal unless appellant is prejudiced by the error); Simmons v. Smith, 888 F.3d 994, 998 (8th Cir. 2018), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 807 (2019) (reviewing de novo decision of district court granting summary judgment in favor of federal agency under APA); Sierra Club v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 252 F.3d 943, 947 (8th Cir. 2001) (arbitrary and capricious standard of review affords agency decisions a “high degree of deference”). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Steven E. Rau, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gertrude Nyanjega v. David Douglas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gertrude-nyanjega-v-david-douglas-ca8-2020.