Gertrude Nyanjega v. David Douglas

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 13, 2020
Docket19-1868
StatusUnpublished

This text of Gertrude Nyanjega v. David Douglas (Gertrude Nyanjega v. David Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gertrude Nyanjega v. David Douglas, (8th Cir. 2020).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 19-1868 ___________________________

Gertrude Nyanjega; Duba Roba

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants

v.

David Douglas, District Director, USCIS, St. Paul Field Office; Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States; Elaine Duke, Ag-Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; Leslie Tritten, Field Office Director

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________

Submitted: February 4, 2020 Filed: February 13, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. In this action seeking relief under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), Gertrude Nyanjega and Duba Roba appeal after the district court1 declined to take judicial notice of certain documents and granted summary judgment in favor of defendants. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Cravens v. Smith, 610 F.3d 1019, 1029 (8th Cir. 2010) (district court does not abuse its discretion by declining to take judicial notice of irrelevant materials; moreover, any error in failing to take judicial notice is not grounds for reversal unless appellant is prejudiced by the error); Simmons v. Smith, 888 F.3d 994, 998 (8th Cir. 2018), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 807 (2019) (reviewing de novo decision of district court granting summary judgment in favor of federal agency under APA); Sierra Club v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 252 F.3d 943, 947 (8th Cir. 2001) (arbitrary and capricious standard of review affords agency decisions a “high degree of deference”). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Steven E. Rau, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kneibert Clinic, LLC v. Smith
610 F.3d 1019 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
Sierra Club, Etc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
252 F.3d 943 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)
Lee Simmons v. Michael Reynolds
888 F.3d 994 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gertrude Nyanjega v. David Douglas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gertrude-nyanjega-v-david-douglas-ca8-2020.