Gersyl Corp. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gersyl Corp. v. City of New York

3 A.D.2d 941, 164 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5305

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 941 (Gersyl Corp. v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gersyl Corp. v. City of New York, 3 A.D.2d 941, 164 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5305 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by an owner of real property to recover damages for injuries to his land and the building thereon alleged to have been caused by excavation on adjoining property, and by the tenant in said building to recover damages alleged to have been sustained in the disturbance of its business caused by the injuries to said building. The appeal is from an order denying a motion, pursuant to subdivision 6- of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, to amend appellants’ notice of claim theretofore filed with the respondent. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by an owner of real property to recover damages for injuries to his land and the building thereon alleged to have been caused by excavation on adjoining property, and by the tenant in said building to recover damages alleged to have been sustained in the disturbance of its business caused by the injuries to said building. The appeal is from an order denying a motion, pursuant to subdivision 6- of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, to amend appellants’ notice of claim theretofore filed with the respondent. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 941, 164 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gersyl-corp-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1957.