GERSTNER EX REL. LUSTER v. Matheny

Missouri Court of Appeals

GERSTNER EX REL. LUSTER v. Matheny

347 S.W.3d 550, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 816, 2011 WL 2413000

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 14, 2011

DocketED 95881

StatusPublished

This text of 347 S.W.3d 550 (GERSTNER EX REL. LUSTER v. Matheny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

GERSTNER EX REL. LUSTER v. Matheny, 347 S.W.3d 550, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 816, 2011 WL 2413000 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Camille Gerstner, by and through her next friend, Kirsten Luster, (Appellant) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment granting Lisa Matheny and Jaclyn Hill’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed de novo the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find Appellant’s claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Camille Gerstner, by and through her next friend, Kirsten Luster, (Appellant) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment granting Lisa Matheny and Jaclyn Hill’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed de novo the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find Appellant’s claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

347 S.W.3d 550, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 816, 2011 WL 2413000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerstner-ex-rel-luster-v-matheny-moctapp-2011.