GERSTNER EX REL. LUSTER v. Matheny

Missouri Court of Appeals

GERSTNER EX REL. LUSTER v. Matheny

347 S.W.3d 550, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 816, 2011 WL 2413000

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 2011·No. ED 95881·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Camille Gerstner, by and through her next friend, Kirsten Luster, (Appellant) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment granting Lisa Matheny and Jaclyn Hill’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed de novo the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find Appellant’s claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Camille Gerstner, by and through her next friend, Kirsten Luster, (Appellant) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment granting Lisa Matheny and Jaclyn Hill’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed de novo the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find Appellant’s claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

GERSTNER EX REL. LUSTER v. Matheny, 347 S.W.3d 550, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 816, 2011 WL 2413000 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

347 S.W.3d 550 (GERSTNER EX REL. LUSTER v. Matheny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.