Gerstley v. Best
156 A. 377, 108 N.J.L. 189, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 240
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gerstley v. Best. Read the opinion of the Court — 8 N.J. Misc. 661 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gerstley v. Best, 156 A. 377, 108 N.J.L. 189, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 240 (N.J. 1931).
156 A. 377 (Gerstley v. Best) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.