Gerstle v. North Jersey Eye Associates

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Gerstle v. North Jersey Eye Associates

508 A.2d 194, 102 N.J. 310, 1985 N.J. LEXIS 2993

DecidedSeptember 10, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 508 A.2d 194 (Gerstle v. North Jersey Eye Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gerstle v. North Jersey Eye Associates, 508 A.2d 194, 102 N.J. 310, 1985 N.J. LEXIS 2993 (N.J. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Leave to appeal is granted, and the September 3, 1985 order of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, Passaic County, is summarily modified as follows:

[311]*311(a) Claude Gerstle, M.D., may practice medicine at 1033 Clifton Avenue, Clifton, pending the disposition of the order to show cause in this matter, to the extent that he may treat, at his office and in surgery, patients whom he had previously treated;

(b) Claude Gerstle, M.D., shall not solicit business from any patient, whether current or prospective, pending disposition of the order to show cause; and

(c) Claude Gerstle, M.D., shall maintain separate and complete records on all patients who employ his services during the period this Order remains in effect, for the purpose of making those records available to the Chancery Division upon its request; and it is further

ORDERED that the motion for a stay is dismissed as moot. Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leave to appeal is granted, and the September 3, 1985 order of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, Passaic County, is summarily modified as follows:

[311]*311(a) Claude Gerstle, M.D., may practice medicine at 1033 Clifton Avenue, Clifton, pending the disposition of the order to show cause in this matter, to the extent that he may treat, at his office and in surgery, patients whom he had previously treated;

(b) Claude Gerstle, M.D., shall not solicit business from any patient, whether current or prospective, pending disposition of the order to show cause; and

(c) Claude Gerstle, M.D., shall maintain separate and complete records on all patients who employ his services during the period this Order remains in effect, for the purpose of making those records available to the Chancery Division upon its request; and it is further

ORDERED that the motion for a stay is dismissed as moot. Jurisdiction is not retained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

508 A.2d 194, 102 N.J. 310, 1985 N.J. LEXIS 2993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerstle-v-north-jersey-eye-associates-nj-1985.