Gersten v. Canvassing Board of Dade County

775 So. 2d 306, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 98, 1995 WL 7656
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 11, 1995·No. No. 94-0335·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joe Gersten appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his civil action, which challenges the outcome of an election for a Dade County Commission seat won by appellee Bruce Kaplan. The dismissal was imposed as a sanction for appellant’s failure to answer interrogatories, even after a 45-day period of extension sought by appellant, a subsequent order requiring the answers to be filed “forthwith,” and a motion to impose sanctions for failure to comply. The trial court found appellant’s failure to answer the interrogatories to be willful. We affirm on authority of Commonwealth Federal Savings and Loan v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla.1990), and Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla.1983).

POLEN, MARK E., FARMER, GARY M. and PARIENTE, BARBARA J., Associate Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gersten v. Canvassing Board of Dade County, 775 So. 2d 306, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 98, 1995 WL 7656 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

775 So. 2d 306 (Gersten v. Canvassing Board of Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ivey v. State
775 So. 2d 306 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)