Gerstein v. Fisher
35 N.Y.S. 1107
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gerstein v. Fisher. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 N.Y.S. 1120 →
Opinion
The order appealed from should be affirmed on the opinion filed by the learned judge below. 33 N. Y. Supp. 1120. In view of the decisions in Collins v. Hydorn, 135 N. Y. 320, 32 N. E. 69, and Furlong v. Banta, 80 Hun, 248, 29 N. Y. Supp. 985, the case of Anderson v. Railroad Co., 9 Daly, 487, cannot be followed, and the decision of Featherson v. Turnpike Co. (Sup.) 24 N. Y. Supp. 603, has no application. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gerstein v. Fisher, 35 N.Y.S. 1107 (superctny 1895).
35 N.Y.S. 1107 (Gerstein v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Collins v. . Hydorn
32 N.E. 69 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Featherson v. President of Newburgh & Cocheton Turnpike Co.
24 N.Y.S. 603 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Furlong v. Banta
29 N.Y.S. 985 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)
Gerstein v. Fisher
33 N.Y.S. 1120 (Superior Court of New York, 1895)
Anderson v. Third Avenue Railroad
9 Daly 487 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1881)