Gerstein v. Fisher

The Superior Court of New York City

Gerstein v. Fisher

14 Misc. 644

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided October 15, 1895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from should be affirmed on the opinion filed by the learned judge below. In view of the decisions in Collins v. Hydorn, 135 N. Y. 320, and Furlong v. Banta, 80 Hun, 248, the case of Anderson v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 9 Daly, 487, cannot be followed, and the decision of Featherson v. Newburgh & C. Turnpike Co., 24 N. Y. Supp. 603, has no application.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present: Freedmah and McAdam, JJ.

- Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from should be affirmed on the opinion filed by the learned judge below. In view of the decisions in Collins v. Hydorn, 135 N. Y. 320, and Furlong v. Banta, 80 Hun, 248, the case of Anderson v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 9 Daly, 487, cannot be followed, and the decision of Featherson v. Newburgh & C. Turnpike Co., 24 N. Y. Supp. 603, has no application.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present: Freedmah and McAdam, JJ.

- Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Gerstein v. Fisher, 14 Misc. 644 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

14 Misc. 644 (Gerstein v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related