Gerst v. Rothman

271 A.D.2d 1018

This text of 271 A.D.2d 1018 (Gerst v. Rothman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gerst v. Rothman, 271 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Opinion

Action to recover damages for common-law deceit. Order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerst-v-rothman-nyappdiv-1947.